In the matter N.M.H et al
| N.M.H, Shasta McCallum and Shasta Casey McCallum |
| Rock County Child Protective Services, The Rock County Family Court, Attorney Jennifer Nash Elliot, Rock County Child Protection Services, Mike Larson, Guardian Ad Litem Lisa Schultz, Shannon Dewey, Rock Sheriff Department, Larson Pam, Janesville Police Department, State of Wisconsin, Jodi Timmerman, Rock County Corporation Counsel, Janesville School District, Judge Alan Bates and Guardian Ad Litem Melissa Brooke Joos |
| 3:2019cv00415 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Supplement to #8 Proposed Amended Complaint (signed) filed by Shasta Casey McCallum. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Request to Transfer Full Record filed in Rock County Family Court by Plaintiff Shasta Casey McCallum. (Attachments: #1 Request Filed in Rock County Case No. 18TP12 and 13GN51) (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 13 Letter from Clerk's Office returning #8 Proposed Amended Complaint for signature. (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Change of Address by Plaintiff Shasta Casey McCallum. (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 11 Affidavit of Shasta McCallum filed by Plaintiff Shasta Casey McCallum re: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, #3 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel. (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 10 Supplement to #9 Amended Document, #8 Proposed Amended Complaint filed by Shasta Casey McCallum. (Attachments: #1 Brief filed in Rock County Juvenile Case, Rock County CPS Reports, and Urine Analysis Reports.) (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 9 Amended Affidavit by Plaintiff Shasta Casey McCallum. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Amended Complaint (see dkt. #15 for signature) by Plaintiff Shasta Casey McCallum. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 7
ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 5/24/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
| Filing 5 Brief in Support of #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, #3 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel by Plaintiffs Shasta Casey McCallum, N.M.H. (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 6 Affidavit of Shasta McCallum filed by Plaintiffs Shasta Casey McCallum, N.M.H re: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, #3 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel. (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 4 Motions for Extension of Time, to File Oversize Improper Documents, Request all Transcript for Case, Relief Under Federal Rule 60 A, B, C, D, and a New Trial by Plaintiffs Shasta Casey McCallum, N.M.H. (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Attorney Assistance by Plaintiffs Shasta Casey McCallum, N.M.H. (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiffs Shasta Casey McCallum, N.M.H. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Shasta McCallum. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (jef) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/22/2019: #1 U.S. Marshal Service Form as to Mike and Pam Larson, #2 U.S. Marshal Service Form as to Jennifer Nash Elliott, #3 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (rks). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
