Czapiewski, David v. Jess, Cathy et al
| David Czapiewski |
| Cathy Jess, Gary Ankarlo, John Doe M.D. and John Doe #2 |
| GBCI Prison Facility |
| 3:2019cv00438 |
| May 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Barbara B Crabb |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice from the Clerk regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet) (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 5 Warden PLRA Letter. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 5/30/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff David Czapiewski. (rks),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/30/2019: #1 IPP Calculation) (rks). |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Czapiewski. (Attachments: #1 Authorization for Release of Institutional Account Information and Payment of the Filing Fee) (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David Czapiewski. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge Barbara B. Crabb.) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (rks),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
