Pope, Timothy v. Wintrust Financial Corporation
| Timothy Pope |
| Wintrust Financial Corporation d/b/a Town Bank and Wintrust Financial Corporation |
| 3:2019cv00554 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 10/11/2019 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (jls) |
| Action Requested: If you have not already provided your #Consent to Magistrate/Request for Reassignment form, please do so by 9/20/2019. (lak) |
| Filing 14 Brief in Support of #13 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Wintrust Financial Corporation, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Deposit Account Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Fee Schedule, #3 Exhibit C - NACHA Rules (Excerpt), #4 Exhibit D - Electronic Fund Transfer Disclosure) (Panoff, Thomas) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS by Defendant Wintrust Financial Corporation. Brief in Opposition due 9/27/2019. Brief in Reply due 10/7/2019. (Panoff, Thomas) |
Filing 12
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Wintrust Financial Corporation answer due 9/6/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 7/24/2019. (jls)
|
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance filed by Jed Wolf Glickstein for Defendant Wintrust Financial Corporation. (Glickstein, Jed) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by Lucia Nale for Defendant Wintrust Financial Corporation. (Nale, Lucia) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Thomas Vangel Panoff for Defendant Wintrust Financial Corporation. (Panoff, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Wintrust Financial Corporation. (Myler, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Wintrust Financial Corporation. (Myler, Samuel) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Samuel P. Myler for Defendant Wintrust Financial Corporation. (Myler, Samuel) |
| Filing 5 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Wintrust Financial Corporation served on 7/11/2019, answer due 8/1/2019. (Strauss, Samuel) |
|
Filing 4
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #3 Motion to Admit Lynn A. Toops Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 7/12/2019. (lak)
|
| Filing 3 Motion to Admit Lynn A. Toops Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2500531.) by Plaintiff Timothy Pope. (Toops, Lynn) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Wintrust Financial Corporation. (jls) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (jls) |
| Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (jls) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wintrust Financial Corporation, ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2497563.), filed by Timothy Pope, (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Strauss, Samuel) Modified on 7/9/2019. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
