Mence, Christopher v. Reeseman, Matt et al
| Christopher Mence |
| Matt Reeseman and Rick Konkakipasiki |
| 3:2019cv00624 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Barbara B Crabb |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Prisoner (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Clerk's office response to #6 letter from plaintiff. (nln),(ps) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Plaintiff Christopher Mence requesting two subpoena forms. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (nln),(ps) |
| Filing 5 Warden PLRA Letter. (nln),(ps) |
| Partial Filing fee received: $6.04, receipt number 34690035090. (nln),(ps) |
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ $6.04 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 8/21/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 7/31/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement, page 1 of 2, by Plaintiff Christopher Mence. (jef),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/31/2019: #1 IPP Calculation) (jef). |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christopher Mence. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matt Reeseman, Rick Konkakipasiki filed by Christopher Mence. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge Barbara B. Crabb.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
