Tinnon, Andre v. Boughton, Gary
| Andre L. Tinnon |
| Gary Boughton |
| WSPF Prison Facility |
| 3:2019cv00713 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil case terminated for plaintiff's failure to pay initial partial filing fee. No fee is owed for filing this case. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 6
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 1.32 assessed due by 9/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 9/3/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Andre L. Tinnon. (Attachments: #1 IPP Calculation) (rks),(ps) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Trust Fund Account Statement due 9/23/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/30/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Andre L. Tinnon. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit of Andre Tinnon. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence, sentencing memorandum, interview/information requests, other documents) (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gary Boughton, filed by Andre L. Tinnon. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (jef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
