Cottonseed, Inc. v. Core Industries, Inc. et al
| Cottonseed, Inc. |
| Cargill, Incorporated and Core Industries, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00915 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Brief in Reply by Defendant Core Industries, Inc. in Support of #11 Motion to Dismiss. (Mennen, Christine) |
| Filing 23 Brief in Reply by Defendant Cargill, Incorporated in Support of #8 Motion to Transfer (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - "Truck", #2 Exhibit B - "Rail", #3 Exhibit C - "About", #4 Exhibit D - "Terminals", #5 Exhibit E - "Barge") (Howard, Giles) |
| Filing 22 Declaration of Nathan Kromke filed by Plaintiff Cottonseed, Inc. in Support of Cottonseed, LLC's Response Memorandum in Opposition re: #11 Motion to Dismiss. (Harvey, Patrick) Modified on 12/13/2019. (lak) |
| Filing 21 Brief in Opposition by Plaintiff Cottonseed, Inc. re: #11 Motion to Dismiss filed by Core Industries, Inc. (Harvey, Patrick) |
| Filing 20 Joint Response re: 16 Text Only Order, by Plaintiff Cottonseed, Inc. (Harvey, Patrick) Modified on 12/9/2019. (lak) |
| Filing 19 Brief in Opposition by Plaintiff Cottonseed, Inc. re: #8 Motion to Transfer filed by Cargill, Incorporated, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - E-mail dated August 29, 2019) (Harvey, Patrick) Modified on 12/6/2019: Detailed e-mail sent to counsel. (lak) |
Filing 18
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER accepting #17 Stipulation to Amend Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss. Brief in Opposition due 12/13/2019. Brief in Reply due 12/27/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 12/5/2019. (rks)
|
| Filing 17 Stipulation to Amend Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Cottonseed, Inc., (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Harvey, Patrick) |
|
Filing 16
** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** In light of defendant Cargill's motion to transfer based on a forum selection clause (dkt. #8 ), the court will not hold a preliminary pretrial conference until it has decided this motion. Even so, the court does not want this case to lose its place in line for trial in the event the transfer motion is denied. The court can try this case on any Monday in March or April, 2021. All parties are to meet and confer in a good faith attempt to agree on a trial date within this range, with their report to the court due by December 9, 2019. If they cannot agree on a date, they should so report, and the court will pick the date for them. The report must include the parties' prediction(s) on how many days the trial will last. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/26/2019. (rks)
|
| Filing 15 Brief in Support of #11 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Core Industries, Inc. (Mennen, Christine) |
| Filing 14 Affidavit of Scott Perry filed by Defendant Core Industries, Inc. re: #11 Motion to Dismiss. (Mennen, Christine) Modified on 11/15/2019: Linked to the correct document. (lak) |
| Filing 13 Affidavit of Christine M. Mennen filed by Defendant Core Industries, Inc. re: #11 Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Barge Freight Agreement) (Mennen, Christine) Modified on 11/15/2019: Linked to the correct document; added exhibit description. E-mail sent to counsel. (lak) |
| Filing 12 Disregard. Refer to #15 . Modified on 11/15/2019. (lak) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Core Industries, Inc. Brief in Opposition due 12/6/2019. Brief in Reply due 12/16/2019. (Mennen, Christine) |
| Filing 10 Exhibit to #8 Motion to Transfer filed by Cargill, Incorporated. Exhibit A - Barge Freight Agreement. (Howard, Giles) Modified on 11/18/2019. (lak) |
| Filing 9 Brief in Support of #8 Motion to Transfer by Defendant Cargill, Incorporated. (Howard, Giles) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO TRANSFER to District of Minnesota by Defendant Cargill, Incorporated. Brief in Opposition due 12/6/2019. Brief in Reply due 12/16/2019. (Howard, Giles) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER by Defendant Cargill, Incorporated. (Howard, Giles) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (rks) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (rks) |
|
Filing 6
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #3 Motion to Admit Robert Dale Nienhuis Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/8/2019. (lak)
|
|
Filing 5
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #1 Motion to Admit Giles B. Howard Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/8/2019. (lak)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Cargill, Incorporated. (Howard, Giles) |
| Filing 3 Motion to Admit Robert Dale Nienhuis Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2573780.) by Defendant Cargill, Incorporated. (Nienhuis, Robert) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from La Crosse County Circuit Court, case number 2019-cv-000554. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2573758), filed by Cargill, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint and Summons, #3 Exhibit B - Consent to Removal) (Howard, Giles) |
| Filing 1 Motion to Admit Giles B. Howard Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2573747.) by Defendant Cargill, Incorporated. (Howard, Giles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
