Perz, Alexandra v. Ideal Image Development Corporation et al
| Alexandra Perz |
| Ideal Image Development Corporation and Ideal Image of Wisconsin, LLC |
| 3:2020cv00012 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is closed without further order of the court. (voc) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Alexandra Perz. (Peterson, Justin) |
Filing 5
** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint in response to this court's order asking for more information about whether plaintiff has satisfied the jurisdictional requirements in 28 U.S.C. 1332. The court is persuaded that the amended complaint adequately alleges all of the requirements for 1332. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/03/2020. (voc)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Alexandra Perz, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Annual Report of WI Ideal Image, #2 Exhibit B - Employee Obligation Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Letter from Atty. Beck) (Peterson, Justin) |
|
Filing 3
** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** Plaintiff has filed a complaint in which she relies solely on 28 U.S.C. 1332 as a basis for jurisdiction, but her complaint doesn't meet the requirements of that statute. First, she hasn't properly alleged diversity of citizenship because she identifies her residence rather than her domicile, see Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671 F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir. 2012), and because she doesn't identify the members of defendant Ideal Image of Wisconsin, LLC or those members' states of citizenship, see Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998). Second, she seeks only declaratory relief, but she doesn't explain why she believes that relief may be reasonably valued at more than $75,000. See Golin v. Neptune Mgmt. Corp., 704 F. App'x 591, 595 (7th Cir. 2017). Because this court has an independent obligation to determine whether it may exercise subject matter jurisdiction, see Carroll v. Stryker Corp., 658 F.3d 675, 680 (7th Cir. 2011), plaintiff may have until January 31, 2020, to file supplemental materials showing that she satisfies the requirements of 1332. If plaintiff fails to respond by January 31, the court will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/17/2020. (voc)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ideal Image Development Corporation, Ideal Image of Wisconsin, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Ideal Image of Wisconsin, LLC) (voc) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (voc) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (voc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2606599.), filed by Alexandra Perz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Employee Obligation Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Letter from Atty. Beck, #3 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons - Ideal Image Development Corporation, #5 Summons - Ideal Image of Wisconsin, LLC) (Peterson, Justin) Modified on 1/8/2020. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
