Dini, Emir v. State of Wisconsin et al
Plaintiff: Emir Dini
Defendant: State of Wisconsin, Cathelene Hanaman, Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau and Richard Champagne
Case Number: 3:2020cv00087
Filed: January 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William M Conley
Referring Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2020 Filing 3 Motion to Seal by Plaintiff Emir Dini. (jef),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/29/2020: #1 Columbus Police Dept. unofficial web report,) (jef).
January 29, 2020 Filing 2 (Sealed) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Emir Dini. (jef),(ps)
January 29, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Emir Dini. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Letter from EEOC, #2 Exhibit 2 - Legislative Research Analyst job announcement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Wis DOJ letter to Mr. Tomlinson, 9/13/19, #4 Exhibit 4 - Email correspondence with AAG Bensky, #5 Exhibit 6 - Email correspondence with AAG Bensky, #6 Exhibit 7 - Applicant notes, #7 Exhibit 8 - Interview notes, #8 Exhibit 9 - Applicant notes, #9 Exhibit 10 - Email correspondence from human resources, State of Wisc., #10 Exhibit 11 - Public records request response, #11 Exhibit 12 - Resume of Jesse Phelps, #12 Exhibit 13 - Email correspondence with City of Madison human resources, #13 Exhibit 14 - Resume of Saran Ouk, #14 Exhibit 15 - Email correspondence re: public record laws, #15 Exhibit 16 - Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau webpage, #16 Blank summonses, #17 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #18 Cover letters, #19 Envelope) (jef). Clerk's office note: there was no exhibit 5 submitted. (jef).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dini, Emir v. State of Wisconsin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Wisconsin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cathelene Hanaman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Champagne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emir Dini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?