Acosta, Reinaldo v. Barter, Cindy et al
Reinaldo Acosta and Reinaldo C. Acosta |
Angela Thompson, Dr. Tannan, W. Borgen, Dr. K. Labby, Cindy Barter, S. Klenke, T. Jaeger and Z. Schroeder |
3:2020cv00109 |
February 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee received : $ 350.00, receipt number 34690036459 (aom),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 271.38 assessed due by 3/3/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 2/11/2020. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Reinaldo Acosta. (jef),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/11/2020: #1 IPP Calculation) (rks). |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Reinaldo Acosta. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Reinaldo Acosta. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Patient education instructions for osteoarthritis and knee sprains, #2 Inmate complaint documents RGCI-2018-26121, #3 Health service requests, #4 Notice of special needs committee decision, #5 Progress notes, #6 Certification as to 3 or more dismissals, #7 Envelope) (jef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.