Davis, Sorden v. Lands' End, Inc. et al
| Sorden Davis |
| Lands' End, Inc. and Lands' End Business Outfitters, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00195 |
| March 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge James D. Peterson: Telephone Motion Hearing held on 3/24/2020 re #4 Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Sorden Davis [:25] (Court Reporter cs.) (skv) |
Filing 8
** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** At the telephone conference held earlier today, the court DENIED plaintiff's motion to consolidate, Dkt. #4 , and GRANTED defendant Lands' End's motion to stay this third-filed proposed class action. Dkt. 29 in the '823 case. This case is STAYED pending resolution of Gilbert v. Lands' End (19-cv-823) and Andrews v. Lands' End (19-cv-1066). Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/24/2020. (voc)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance as additional counsel filed by John D. Blythin for Plaintiff Sorden Davis. (Blythin, John) |
|
Filing 6
** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** Counsel for Gilbert (No. 19-cv-823) and Andrews (No. 19-cv-1066) have filed a motion to appoint interim counsel for the proposed class under Rule 23(g)(3). See Dkt. 32 in the '823 case. Counsel for Lands' End and Davis (plaintiff in No. 20-cv-195) should be prepared to respond to this motion orally at the March 24, 2020 motion hearing. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/19/2020. (jls)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to Motion to Consolidate Cases. Telephone Motion Hearing reset for 3/24/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge James D. Peterson. Counsel for Defendant responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5504. (jls) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting 15 Motion for Hearing (Oral Argument) re: 13 Motion to Strike Class Allegations (19-cv-823); Setting a Telephone Motion Hearing for 3/20/2020 at 01:00 PM before Judge James D. Peterson. Counsel for Defendant responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5504. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/13/2020. (jls)
|
| Filing 4 Motion to Consolidate Cases by Plaintiff Sorden Davis. Response due 3/16/2020. (Blythin, John) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance as additional counsel filed by John D. Blythin for Plaintiff Sorden Davis. (Blythin, John) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Lands' End Business Outfitters, Inc. and Lands' End, Inc. (jls) |
| Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Related cases 19-cv-823 and 19-cv-1066. (jls) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (jls) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) against Lands' End, Inc., Lands' End Business Outfitters, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2639644.) AT ISSUE: ;, COMPLAINT against Lands' End, Inc., Lands' End Business Outfitters, Inc.. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2639644.), filed by Sorden Davis. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons on Lands' End, Inc., #3 Summons on Land's End Business Outfitters, Inc.) (Fruchter, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
