Shaw, Vonell v. Novak, Susan
| Vonell Lavell Shaw |
| Susan Novak |
| CCI Prison Facility |
| 3:2020cv00240 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 34690036878. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 5 Letter from petitioner regarding filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter and Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
Filing 4
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting petitioner Vonell Shaw's #3 request for an extension of time. Petitioner to submit $5 Filing Fee or Motion for IFP w/ Trust Fund Account Statement by 5/11/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 4/13/2020. (jef),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Letter requesting an extension of time by Petitioner Vonell Lavell Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER that petitioner to submit $5 Filing Fee or Motion for IFP w/ Trust Fund Account Statement by 4/8/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 03/18/2020. (aom),(ps)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State, filed by Vonell Lavell Shaw. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (aom) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
