Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC v. Athey, Jay
Plaintiff: Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant: Law Offices of Kimberly J. Weissman, LLC and The Bureaus, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Jay Athey
Case Number: 3:2020cv00517
Filed: June 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #1 Motion to Admit Martin Thomas Tully Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 6/8/2020. (jls)
June 8, 2020 Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (jls)
June 8, 2020 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (jls)
June 5, 2020 Filing 4 Notice by Third Party Defendants Law Offices of Kimberly J. Weissman, LLC, The Bureaus, Inc. New Case Party Information. (Tully, Martin)
June 5, 2020 Filing 3 Notice by Third Party Defendants Law Offices of Kimberly J. Weissman, LLC, The Bureaus, Inc. Civil Cover Sheet. (Tully, Martin)
June 5, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dane County Circuit Court, case number 2020SC000793. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2691042), filed by Law Offices of Kimberly J. Weissman, LLC, The Bureaus, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Removal) (Tully, Martin)
June 5, 2020 Filing 1 Motion to Admit Martin Thomas Tully Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2691031.) by Third Party Defendants Law Offices of Kimberly J. Weissman, LLC, The Bureaus, Inc.. (Tully, Martin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC v. Athey, Jay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: Law Offices of Kimberly J. Weissman, LLC
Represented By: Martin Thomas Tully
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: The Bureaus, Inc.
Represented By: Martin Thomas Tully
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: Jay Athey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?