Bell-Yellin, Penny et al v. Superior Refining Company LLC
Penny L. Bell-Yellin, Bruce M. Bell-Yellin and Bruce M. Yellin |
Superior Refining Company LLC and Husky Energy Inc. |
3:2020cv00631 |
July 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Brief in Reply by Defendant Superior Refining Company LLC in Support of #12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Olson, Joseph) |
Filing 19 Brief in Opposition by Plaintiffs Bruce M. Bell-Yellin, Penny L. Bell-Yellin re: #12 Motion to Dismiss filed by Superior Refining Company LLC (Straka, Heath) |
Filing 18 Pretrial Conference Order - # Preliminary Pretrial Packet in cases assigned to District Judge William M. Conley attached. Dispositive Motions due 2/11/2022. Settlement Letters due 5/27/2022. Motions in Limine due 6/3/2022. Response to Motion due 6/17/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/28/2022 at 04:00 PM. Jury Selection and Trial set for 7/11/2022 at 09:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 12/2/2020. (voc) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker: Telephone Preliminary Pretrial Conference held on 12/1/2020 [:10] (cak) |
Filing 17 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Olson, Joseph) |
Filing 16 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time. Brief in Opposition due 12/18/2020. Brief in Reply due 1/11/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/17/2020. (voc) |
Filing 15 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiffs Bruce M. Bell-Yellin, Penny L. Bell-Yellin. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Straka, Heath) |
Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 12/1/2020 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (voc) |
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Superior Refining Company LLC. (Olson, Joseph) |
Filing 13 Brief in Support of #12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Superior Refining Company LLC (Olson, Joseph) |
Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Superior Refining Company LLC. Brief in Opposition due 11/23/2020. Brief in Reply due 12/3/2020. (Olson, Joseph) |
Filing 11 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #8 Motion to Admit Colleen M. Kenney Pro Hac Vice; granting #9 Motion to Admit Dino L. LaVerghetta Pro Hac Vice; granting #10 Motion to Admit Kara McCall Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/30/2020. (lak) |
Filing 10 Motion to Admit Kara McCall Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2774913.) by Defendant Superior Refining Company LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (McCall, Kara) |
Filing 9 Motion to Admit Dino L LaVerghetta Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2774911.) by Defendant Superior Refining Company LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (LaVerghetta, Dino) |
Filing 8 Motion to Admit Colleen M. Kenney Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2774905.) by Defendant Superior Refining Company LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Kenney, Colleen) |
Filing 7 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** The court is in receipt of the parties' stipulation proposing to dismiss defendant Husky Energy, Inc. (Dkt. #6 .). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), see Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857-58 (7th Cir. 2015), the court will DISMISS Husky Energy, Inc. from this case without prejudice and the clerk is ordered to TERMINATE that defendant. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/24/2020. (voc/ns) |
Filing 6 Stipulation to dismiss Husky Energy Inc. without prejudice by Defendants Husky Energy Inc., Superior Refining Company LLC. (Olson, Joseph) |
Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant Superior Refining Company LLC. Superior Refining Company LLC waiver sent on 9/3/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. (Olson, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Joseph Louis Olson for Defendants Husky Energy Inc., Superior Refining Company LLC. (Olson, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Garrett Matthew Gondik for Plaintiffs Bruce M. Bell-Yellin, Penny L. Bell-Yellin. (Gondik, Garrett) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Husky Energy Inc. and Superior Refining Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Superior Refining Company) (voc) |
Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Related to 18-cv-00697,19-cv-00462 and 18-cv-00917. (voc) |
Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (voc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Husky Energy Inc., Superior Refining Company LLC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2710483.), filed by Penny L. Bell-Yellin, Bruce M. Bell-Yellin. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons -Husky Energy, #3 Summons -Superior Refining Company) (Straka, Heath) Modified on 7/9/2020: Defendant Bruce M. Bell-Yellin or Bruce M. Yellin? E-mail sent to counsel. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.