Bollerud, Ty v. City of Janesville Gov. et al
| Ty A Bollerud |
| Mark Freitag, Jennifer Petrozzellto, Wald Klimczyk, City of Janesville Gov. and Kelly Bedessem |
| 3:2020cv00882 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing this case for plaintiff Ty A. Bollerud's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment for defendants and close this case. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/19/2020. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 09/23/20. (aom),(ps)
|
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ty A Bollerud. (aom),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Ty A Bollerud. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Letter from Building Director Clippert of Department of Public Works, City of Janesville) (aom),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
