Vogts, Brandon v. Parr Interactive, LLC et al
| Brandon Vogts |
| Parr Interactive, LLC and Matthew Breen |
| 3:2020cv00936 |
| October 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Action Requested: Counsel for plaintiff requested to promptly file proof of service. (rks) |
| Filing 3 Report on Filing of Copyright Action. Copy mailed to Copyright Office. (arw) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Parr Interactive, LLC, Matthew Breen. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Matthew Breen) (arw) |
| Standard attachments for District Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (arw) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (arw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matthew Breen, Parr Interactive, LLC. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0758-2763196) filed by Brandon Vogts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Stone Canyon Photographs, #2 Exhibit 2 - Screen Captures of Webpage, #3 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Report on Filing Copyright Action, #5 Summons, #6 Summons) (Kleinman, Nathaniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
