Coffee, Marte v. Barber, Eric et al
| Marte Coffee |
| Mike Meisner, Eric Barber and Jerry Jaeger |
| 3:2020cv00965 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Record from Dane County Circuit Court. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Record, #3 Envelope) (lam),(ps) |
| Filing 4 Declaration of Michelle Sonnentag filed by Defendants Eric Barber, Jerry Jaeger re: Motion for Screening of Complaint (McElgunn, Christopher),(ps) |
| Prison Litigation Reform Act (PRLA) Screening. (jef),(ps) |
| Judge update in case. Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER by Defendants Eric Barber, Jerry Jaeger. (McElgunn, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Christopher J McElgunn for Defendants Eric Barber, Jerry Jaeger. (McElgunn, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Dane County, case number 20CV1819. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2768873), filed by Jerry Jaeger, Eric Barber. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A- Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B- Declaration of Michelle Sonnetag, #4 Certificate of Service) (McElgunn, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
