Niemann, Bernard et al v. Mallery & Zimmerman, S.C.
| Sondra S. Niemann and Bernard J. Niemann, Jr. |
| Mallery & Zimmerman, S.C. |
| 3:2020cv00979 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiffs Bernard J. Niemann, Jr, Sondra S. Niemann (Davidson, James) |
| Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is closed without further order of the court. (kwf) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Mallery & Zimmerman, S.C. (kwf) |
| Standard attachments for District Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mallery & Zimmerman, S.C.. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2772620.), filed by Sondra S. Niemann, Bernard J. Niemann, Jr. (Attachments: #1 State Court Summons and Collection Complaint, #2 Exhibit FDCPA Notice, #3 Summons, #4 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davidson, James) Modified on 10/26/2020. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
