Hernandez-Smith, Vance v. O'Donnell et al
Vance Hernandez-Smith |
C. O'Donnell, M. Canziani, J. Kubala, C. Buesgen and J. Williams |
3:2020cv01117 |
December 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee received: $ 402, receipt number 34690038203 (jef),(ps) |
Paid Prisoner Screening. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT is entered dismissing this case without prejudice. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER on Leave to Proceed: Plaintiff Vance Hernandez-Smith is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, subject to being reopened if Hernandez-Smith submits the $402 filing fee for this case by January 25, 2021. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/6/2021. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Vance Hernandez-Smith. (nln),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/18/2020: #1 IPP Calculation) (nln). |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Vance Hernandez-Smith. (nln),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Vance Hernandez-Smith. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Complaint Number SCI-2020-17786, #2 Cover Letter and Envelope) (nln),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.