Coleman, Sidney et al v. Eau Claire Police Department et al
| Lakesha Johnson, Sidney L. Coleman, K.L.C., C.L.C, Timothy Coleman, S.L.C. and K.L.C |
| Jon M. Theisen, John F. Manydeeds, John Doe 2, City of Eau Claire, John Doe 4, Angela L. Beranek, John Doe 6, John Doe 3, State of Wisconsin, Officer Vang, John Doe 5, Kelly Mandelstein, Eau Claire Police Department and John Doe 1 |
| 3:2021cv00065 |
| January 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 02/01/21. (aom),(ps)
|
|
Filing 4
Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (aom),(ps)
|
|
Filing 3
Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Sidney L. Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (aom),(ps)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Lakesha Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (aom),(ps)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by All Plaintiffs. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (aom),(ps)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
