Jones, Sarah v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Dean Health Plan, Inc., State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Corporation and Sarah Jones |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 3:2021cv00078 |
| February 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/31/2021. (lak)
|
| Filing 13 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge (Tenebruso, Evan) |
|
Filing 12
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER accepting #11 Stipulation to Amend Caption. The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the case caption in the manner requested by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/23/2021. (kwf)
|
| Filing 11 Stipulation to Amend Caption by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Corporation. (Tenebruso, Evan) |
| Action Requested: If you have not already provided your #Consent to Magistrate/Request for Reassignment form, please do so by 3/30/2021. (lak) |
| Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 4/13/2021 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (kwf) |
| Filing 10 Brief in Reply by Plaintiff Sarah Jones in Support of Assignment of Subrogation Claim and Dismising Dean Health Plan, Inc. (Eisenberg, Stephen) |
| Set Briefing Deadlines as to #9 Assignment of Subrogation Claim and Motion for Dismissal. Brief in Response due 3/9/2021. (lak) |
| Filing 9 Assignment of Subrogation Claim and Motion for Dismissal by Plaintiff Dean Health Plan, Inc. (Stock-Retzloff, Jamie) Modified on 3/3/2021. (lak) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Corporation. (Tenebruso, Evan) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Corporation. (Tenebruso, Evan) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Service by Plaintiff Sarah Jones. (Eisenberg, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Service by Plaintiff Sarah Jones. (Eisenberg, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Service by Plaintiff Sarah Jones. (Eisenberg, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Sarah Jones. (Eisenberg, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Dean Health Plan, Inc., State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Corporation, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Corporation. (kwf) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf) |
| Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (kwf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Corporation. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-2822828.), filed by Sarah Jones. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (Eisenberg, Stephen) Modified on 2/3/2021: Complaint identifies State Farm as Company, not Corporation. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
