Suchomel, Dawn v. Aramark Campus, LLC
Plaintiff: Dawn Suchomel
Defendant: Aramark Campus, LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv00205
Filed: March 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William M Conley
Referring Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #7 Motion to Admit Stephanie Sweitzer Pro Hac Vice; granting #8 Motion to Admit Anna Perocchi Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 5/7/2021. (lak)
May 6, 2021 Filing 8 Motion to Admit Anna Perocchi Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2871668.) by Defendant Aramark Campus, LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Attachments: #1 IL Certificate of Good Standing) (Perocchi, Anna)
May 6, 2021 Filing 7 Motion to Admit Stephanie Sweitzer Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2871485.) by Defendant Aramark Campus, LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Attachments: #1 IL Certificate of Good Standing) (Sweitzer, Stephanie)
May 6, 2021 Set Telephone Pretrial or Status Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 6/3/2021 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (rks)
May 5, 2021 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Aramark Campus, LLC. (Raynor, Agatha)
May 5, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Defendant Aramark Campus, LLC. (Raynor, Agatha)
May 3, 2021 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Agatha K. Raynor for Defendant Aramark Campus, LLC. (Raynor, Agatha)
April 22, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Returned Executed. Aramark Campus, LLC served on 4/14/2021, answer due 5/5/2021. (Fairweather, Nicholas)
March 26, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Aramark Campus, LLC. (rks)
March 26, 2021 Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (rks)
March 26, 2021 Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (rks)
March 25, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aramark Campus, LLC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-2849318.), filed by Dawn Suchomel. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons) (Fairweather, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suchomel, Dawn v. Aramark Campus, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Campus, LLC
Represented By: Anna Perocchi
Represented By: Agatha K. Raynor
Represented By: Stephanie Sweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawn Suchomel
Represented By: Jakob E. Feltham
Represented By: Nicholas E. Fairweather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?