Pearson Jr, David et al v. La Crosse County Police Department et al
David Anthony Pearson Jr and Rory Deer |
La Crosse County and La Crosse County Police Department |
3:2021cv00381 |
June 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiffs David Anthony Pearson Jr. (Attachments: #1 IPP Calculation, #2 Envelope) (aom),(ps) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Letter from plaintiff David Pearson regarding trust fund account statement. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #5 Order on ifp request - Initial Order on ifp. Mail re-sent to David Anthony Pearson, Jr. at the address listed on the dkt. #1 complaint. (Plaintiff Pearson has been released.) (kmd),(ps) Modified on 6/18/2021 (jef). |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 Letter from Clerk's Office to Plaintiff Rory Deer regarding unsigned #1 complaint. (aom),(ps) |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Anthony Pearson Jr. (aom),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Rory Deer, David Anthony Pearson Jr. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (aom),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.