Blanck, Walter v. Hall, Bud et al
| Walter William Blanck |
| Bud Hall, Albert Ness, Gene Magnuson, Daniel S. Craft, Steven Biskupic, Michael Best and Associates, Sgt Beverly, C/O Verdegen and Sgt. Laufenberg |
| GBCI Prison Facility |
| 3:2021cv00435 |
| July 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT is entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 3
ORDER that this case is DISMISSED as frivolous. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment for defendants and close the case. The clerk of court is directed to record a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff Walter William Blanck is sanctioned as stated in this opinion. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 7/15/2021. (lam),(ps)
|
| Filing 2 Motion (letter format) from plaintiff regarding filing fees being paid with stimulus payments and request for status conference. (Attachments: #1 Copy of TFAS with Notes, #2 Envelope) (kmd),(ps) |
| 3 Strike Screening. (aom),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Walter William Blanck. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (aom),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
