Stelter, Tabitha v. School District of Wisconsin Dells et al
Tabitha Stelter |
School District of Wisconsin Dells and The School Board of the School District of Wisconsin Dells |
3:2021cv00463 |
July 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Action Requested: Counsel for plaintiff requested to promptly file proof of service. (jls) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to School District of Wisconsin Dells, The School Board of the School District of Wisconsin Dells. (jls) |
Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (jls) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (jls) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-2908307.), filed by Tabitha Stelter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - April 26, 2021 Notice of Right to Sue, #2 Exhibit B - June 29, 2021 Notice of Right to Sue, #3 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons School District of WI Dells, #5 Summons The School Board of the School District of WI Dells) (Good, Colin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.