Doolittle, Robin v. BNSF Railway Company
| Robin R. Doolittle |
| BNSF Railway Company and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company |
| 3:2021cv00523 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Richard Thomas Sikes, Jr for Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Sikes, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Stipulation for to Allow Plaintiff Leave to File Amended Complaint by Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Mcfadden, William) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by William Joseph Mcfadden for Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Mcfadden, William) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to BNSF Railway Company. (voc) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (voc) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (voc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AT LAW against BNSF Railway Company. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-2922305.), filed by Robin R. Doolittle. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Monroe, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
