Maholmes, Antonio v. Price, Ben et al
| Antonio Maholmes, Jr. |
| Ben Price, B.J. Thumann, B.M. Copas, R.E. Austin, Shaun Morrow, Reisha Mitchell, Brian Hayes and Kathryn Yanke |
| 3:2021cv00573 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil case terminated for plaintiff's failure to pay initial partial filing fee. No fee is owed for filing this case. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #4 Order. Mail not re-sent to Antonio Maholmes; no forwarding address provided. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 54.60 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 10/4/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 09/13/2021. (aom),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Antonio Maholmes, Jr (Attachments: #1 IPP Calculation) (aom),(ps) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Antonio Maholmes, Jr. (aom),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Antonio Maholmes, Jr. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (aom),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
