Mark, Jonathon v. Winkleski et al
| Jonathon Mark |
| Mr. Winkleski, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Cahak, Mr. Ingenthron, Mr. Rahif, Ms. Harper, Lt. Haag, Ms. Huneke and John and/or Jane Doe(s) |
| 3:2021cv00650 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Complaint taken under advisement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/25/2021. (aom),(ps)
|
| Filing 5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jonathon Mark. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (aom),(ps) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Plaintiff Regarding Additional Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Additional Defendants, #2 Envelope) (aom),(ps) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that Plaintiff to submit an Affidavit of Indigency by 11/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/15/2021. (aom),(ps)
|
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jonathon Mark. (aom),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Jonathon Mark. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (aom),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
