Hainz, Tiffany v. The City of Marshfield, Wisconsin et al
Tiffany Hainz |
The City of Marshfield, Wisconsin, Richard Gramza and Gary Jepsen |
3:2021cv00800 |
December 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant The City of Marshfield, Wisconsin. The City of Marshfield, Wisconsin waiver sent on 12/29/2021, answer due 2/28/2022. (Olson, Jeff) |
Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant Gary Jepsen. Gary Jepsen waiver sent on 12/29/2021, answer due 2/28/2022. (Olson, Jeff) |
Filing 2 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant Richard Gramza. Richard Gramza waiver sent on 12/29/2021, answer due 2/28/2022. (Olson, Jeff) |
Standard attachments for District Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Service to be completed by Waiver of Service of Summons. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-2981196.), filed by Tiffany Hainz. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olson, Jeff) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.