Klaas, Frederick v. IGT Global Solutions Corporation
Plaintiff: Frederick Klaas
Defendant: IGT Global Solutions Corporation
Case Number: 3:2021cv00820
Filed: December 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Referring Judge: James D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Brief in Reply by Defendant IGT Global Solutions Corporation in Support of #4 Motion to Dismiss (Harrison, Kendall)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Standing Order Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information in a Complex Civil Lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/16/2022. (voc)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Pretrial Conference Order - # Preliminary Pretrial Packet in cases assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson attached. Motion to Certify Class under Rule 23 due 12/2/2022. Dispositive Motions due 7/28/2023. Settlement Letters due 1/5/2024. Motions in Limine due 1/12/2024. Response to Motion due 1/26/2024. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/7/2024 at 04:00 PM. Jury Selection and Trial set for 2/12/2024 at 09:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/16/2022. (voc)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker: Telephone Preliminary Pretrial Conference held on 2/15/2022 [:10] (cak)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Brief in Opposition by Plaintiff Frederick Klaas re: #4 Motion to Dismiss filed by IGT Global Solutions Corporation (Lueder, Michael)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Harrison, Kendall)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Plaintiff's unopposed motion to extend briefing deadlines is granted. His response is due February 11, 2022, with defendant's reply due by February 25, 2022. The February 15, 2022 telephonic preliminary pretrial conference will be held as scheduled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 1/25/2022. (kwf)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Motion for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Frederick Klaas. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Response due 2/1/2022. (Lueder, Michael)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 2/15/2022 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (kwf)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Standard attachments for District Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Certificate of Service by Defendant IGT Global Solutions Corporation. (Lenz, Maxted)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Maxted Lenz for Defendant IGT Global Solutions Corporation. (Lenz, Maxted)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Declaration of Peter Daniels filed by Defendant IGT Global Solutions Corporation re: #4 Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Contract (part 1 of 5), #2 Exhibit A - Contract (part 2 of 5), #3 Exhibit A - Contract (part 3 of 5), #4 Exhibit A - Contract (part 4 of 5), #5 Exhibit A - Contract (part 5 of 5)) (Harrison, Kendall)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Brief in Support of #4 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant IGT Global Solutions Corporation (Harrison, Kendall)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS by Defendant IGT Global Solutions Corporation. Brief in Opposition due 1/20/2022. Brief in Reply due 1/31/2022. (Harrison, Kendall)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant IGT Global Solutions Corporation. (Harrison, Kendall)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Declaration of Peter Daniels re #1 Notice of Removal, (Harrison, Kendall)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dane County Circuit Court, case number 21-cv-002831. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-2985537), filed by IGT Global Solutions Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Docket, #3 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Harrison, Kendall)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klaas, Frederick v. IGT Global Solutions Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick Klaas
Represented By: Timothy Michael Hansen
Represented By: Michael C. Lueder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IGT Global Solutions Corporation
Represented By: Maxted Lenz
Represented By: Kendall W. Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?