Gronnert, John v. Americollect, Inc.
Plaintiff: John Gronnert
Defendant: Americollect, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv00160
Filed: March 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William M Conley
Referring Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2022 Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 6/14/2022 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (kwf)
May 16, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER by Defendant Americollect, Inc.. (Hanus, David)
April 26, 2022 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by David John Hanus for Defendant Americollect, Inc.. (Hanus, David)
April 26, 2022 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Americollect, Inc.. (Schultz, David)
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Americollect, Inc. answer due 5/16/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 4/26/2022. (kwf)
April 25, 2022 Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant Americollect, Inc.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Schultz, David)
April 25, 2022 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by David M. Schultz for Defendant Americollect, Inc. (Schultz, David) Modified on 4/26/2022: Western District of Michigan. (lak)
April 13, 2022 Filing 5 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Americollect, Inc. served on 4/4/2022, answer due 4/25/2022. (Marco, David)
March 24, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Americollect, Inc. (lak)
March 24, 2022 Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak)
March 24, 2022 Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak)
March 23, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Larry P. Smith for Plaintiff John Gronnert. (Smith, Larry)
March 23, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by David Michael Marco for Plaintiff John Gronnert. (Marco, David)
March 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Americollect, Inc.. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-3026433.), filed by John Gronnert. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Marco, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gronnert, John v. Americollect, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Gronnert
Represented By: Larry P. Smith
Represented By: David Michael Marco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Americollect, Inc.
Represented By: David John Hanus
Represented By: David M. Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?