Kostick, Alexis v. Masonite Corp. et al
Alexis Kostick |
Masonite Corp., Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Employbridge, LLC and EmployBridge Holding Company |
3:2022cv00191 |
April 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Briefing Deadlines as to #13 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. Brief in Opposition due 6/15/2022. Brief in Reply due 6/22/2022. (voc/slc) |
Filing 14 Brief in Support of #13 Motion to Compel, Arbitration and Stay Proceedings by Defendants EmployBridge Holding Company, Employbridge, LLC, Remedy Intelligent Staffing (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Christine Bestor Townsend, #2 Exhibit A - Kostick Arbitration Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - Kostick Arbitration Agreement) (Townsend, Christine) Modified on 6/1/2022: E-mail sent to counsel re: declaration. (lak) |
Filing 13 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings by Defendants EmployBridge Holding Company, Employbridge, LLC, Remedy Intelligent Staffing. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Response due 6/7/2022. (Townsend, Christine) |
Filing 12 ANSWER by Defendant Masonite Corp.. (Sosna, Jeremy) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Masonite Corp.. (Sosna, Jeremy) |
Filing 10 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Defendants' answer due 5/31/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/11/2022. (jls) |
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Christine E. Bestor Townsend for Defendants EmployBridge Holding Company, Employbridge, LLC, Remedy Intelligent Staffing. (Townsend, Christine) |
Filing 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Defendants EmployBridge Holding Company, Employbridge, LLC, Remedy Intelligent Staffing. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Response due 5/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Townsend, Christine) Modified on 5/10/2022. (lak) |
Filing 7 Disregard. Modified on 5/10/2022. (lak) |
Filing 6 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER accepting and granting #5 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/10/2022. (kwf) |
Filing 5 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Defendant Masonite Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Sosna, Jeremy) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Masonite Corp. answer due 5/24/2022. (kwf) |
Filing 4 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Remedy Intelligent Staffing served on 4/19/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. (Schultz, Mason) |
Filing 3 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Masonite Corp. served on 4/19/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. (Schultz, Mason) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as all Defendants. (lak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-3032879.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (Schultz, Mason) Modified on 4/6/2022: Changed county from Dane to Clark. (lak) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.