Tschudy, Jacob v. PepsiCo, Inc.
Jacob Tschudy |
PepsiCo, Inc. |
3:2022cv00210 |
April 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **The court is in receipt of plaintiff Jacob Tschudy's unopposed motion to transfer venue to the Southern District of New York. (Dkt. #10 .) In light of defendant's lack of opposition, coupled with the fact that the requirements for transfer under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) are satisfied here, the motion is GRANTED. The clerk's office is directed to TRANSFER this case to the Southern District of New York. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/19/2022. (kwf) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION TO TRANSFER to SDNY by Plaintiff Jacob Tschudy. Brief in Opposition due 6/8/2022. Brief in Reply due 6/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Parmet, Matthew) |
Filing 9 Notice of Consent to Join Lawsuit by Plaintiff Jacob Tschudy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent, #3 Exhibit 3 - Consent, #4 Exhibit 4 - Consent, #5 Exhibit 5 - Consent) (Parmet, Matthew) |
Filing 8 Notice of Consent to Join Lawsuit by Plaintiff Jacob Tschudy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent, #3 Exhibit 3 - Consent) (Parmet, Matthew) |
Filing 7 Notice of Consent to Join Lawsuit by Plaintiff Jacob Tschudy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent) (Parmet, Matthew) Modified on 5/3/2022: E-mail sent to counsel. (lak) |
Filing 6 Notice of Consent to Join Lawsuit by Plaintiff Jacob Tschudy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent) (Parmet, Matthew) |
Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant PepsiCo, Inc.. PepsiCo, Inc. waiver sent on 4/18/2022, answer due 6/17/2022. (Parmet, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PepsiCo, Inc. (lak) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Filing 3 Notice of Consent to Join Lawsuit by Plaintiff Jacob Tschudy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent) (Parmet, Matthew) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons by Plaintiff Jacob Tschudy. (Parmet, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PepsiCo, Inc.. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-3036573.), filed by Jacob Tschudy. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Parmet, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tschudy, Jacob v. PepsiCo, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jacob Tschudy | |
Represented By: | Matthew Scott Parmet |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PepsiCo, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.