Haas, Sarah v. eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC
Sarah Haas |
eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC |
3:2022cv00212 |
April 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Kruse, Natalia) |
Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 6/15/2022 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (voc) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC. (Kruse, Natalia) |
Filing 9 ANSWER by Defendant eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC. (Kruse, Natalia) |
Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC answer due 5/20/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/5/2022. (lak) |
Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Kruse, Natalia) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Natalia S. Kruse for Defendant eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC. (Kruse, Natalia) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Marci V. Kawski for Defendant eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC. (Kawski, Marci) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Scott J. Helfand for Defendant eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC. (Helfand, Scott) |
Filing 3 Summons Returned Executed. eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC served on 4/14/2022, answer due 5/5/2022. (Lyons, Thomas) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC. (lak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (CLASS ACTION) with Jury Trial Demanded against eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-3037129.), filed by Sarah Haas. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Lyons, Thomas) |
Case directly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Related cases 21-cv-648 and 21-cv-680. (lak) |
Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Haas, Sarah v. eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sarah Haas | |
Represented By: | Eric Leighton Crandall |
Represented By: | Thomas John Lyons, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: eMoneyUSA Holdings LLC | |
Represented By: | Marci V. Kawski |
Represented By: | Natalia S. Kruse |
Represented By: | Scott J. Helfand |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.