Arash, Mohammad v. The Mission Essential Group, LLC
Mohammad Arash |
The Mission Essential Group, LLC |
3:2022cv00222 |
April 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 JUDGMENT in favor of Mohammad Arash against The Mission Essential Group, LLC in the amount of $18,414.40. (voc) |
Filing 10 Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment by Plaintiff Mohammad Arash (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Offer of Judgment) (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time by Defendant The Mission Essential Group, LLC. Response due 7/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (McNamara, Anthony) |
Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER accepting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/31/2022. (voc) |
Filing 7 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #5 Motion to Admit Anthony Patrick McNamara Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/31/2022. (lak) |
Filing 6 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant The Mission Essential Group, LLC. (McNamara, Anthony) |
Filing 5 Motion to Admit Anthony Patrick McNamara Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number AWIWDC-3066158.) by Defendant The Mission Essential Group, LLC. (McNamara, Anthony) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: The Mission Essential Group, LLC answer due 6/28/2022. (voc) |
Filing 4 Summons Returned Executed. The Mission Essential Group, LLC served on 5/10/2022, answer due 5/31/2022. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Mission Essential Group, LLC. (lak) |
Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (lak) |
Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons by Plaintiff Mohammad Arash. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Mission Essential Group, LLC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-3040562.), filed by Mohammad Arash. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sanford, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Arash, Mohammad v. The Mission Essential Group, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mohammad Arash | |
Represented By: | Joshua Sanford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Mission Essential Group, LLC | |
Represented By: | Anthony Patrick McNamara |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.