S., G. G. et al v. National Presto Industries, Inc.
| G. G. S. and Melissa Davis |
| National Presto Industries, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00228 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. National Presto Industries, Inc. served on 6/15/2022, answer due 7/6/2022. (Kress, Adam) |
| Second Action Requested: Counsel for plaintiff requested to promptly file proof of service. (rks) |
| Action Requested: Counsel for plaintiff requested to promptly file proof of service. (kwf) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to National Presto Industries, Inc. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Presto Industries, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3043006.), filed by G. G. S., Melissa Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Owner's Manual, #2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Kress, Adam) Modified on 4/25/2022. (lak) |
| Case directly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Related case 20-cv-1060-jdp. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
