Stenson, Virginia v. US Bank
| Virginia Stenson |
| US Bank |
| 3:2022cv00246 |
| May 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is closed without further order of the court. (rks) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Virginia Stenson (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Settlement by Plaintiff Virginia Stenson (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 12 Disregard. Modified on 6/7/2022. (lak) |
Filing 11
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. US Bank answer due 6/8/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/19/2022. (rks)
|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant US Bank. (Gresik, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant US Bank. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Gresik, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew C. Gresik for Defendant US Bank. (Gresik, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed. US Bank served on 5/4/2022, answer due 5/25/2022. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to US Bank. (lak) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Angie K. Robertson for Plaintiff Virginia Stenson. (Robertson, Angie) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Mary Elizabeth Philipps for Plaintiff Virginia Stenson. (Philipps, Mary) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by David Joseph Philipps for Plaintiff Virginia Stenson. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Virginia Stenson. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against US Bank. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3049233.), filed by Virginia Stenson. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Philipps, David) Modified on 5/3/2022: Corrected the Nature of Suit. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stenson, Virginia v. US Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Virginia Stenson | |
| Represented By: | Angie K. Robertson |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Represented By: | David Joseph Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: US Bank | |
| Represented By: | Andrew C. Gresik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
