Simon, Charles v. Department of Justice et al
Plaintiff: Charles Simon
Defendant: Department of Justice, En Banc U.S. Appeals Court, U.S. Appeals Court, Hon. Rudolph Contreras, Federal Prison Industries, Inc., Steve Schwalb and T. Speights
Case Number: 3:2022cv00261
Filed: May 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Referring Judge: James D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Filing 10 FINAL JUDGMENT from USCA affirming district court as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Charles Simon. No record to be returned. (Attachments: #1 USCA Order, #2 USCA Notice of Issuance of Mandate) (voc),(ps)
June 6, 2022 Filing 9 Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Docket Sheet and Judgment to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re: #7 Notice of Appeal, (Attachments: #1 Order dismissing case dated May 16, 2022, #2 Judgment, #3 Text order denying motion to alter or amend judgment dated May 27, 2022, #4 Docket sheet). (lam),(ps)
June 6, 2022 USCA Case Number 22-1996 for #7 Notice of Appeal, filed by Charles Simon. (jef),(ps)
June 3, 2022 Filing 8 Appeal Information Packet. (lam),(ps)
June 3, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Plaintiff Charles Simon as to 6 Order on Motion for Relief from Judgment, #3 Dismissal Order, #4 Judgment. Filing fee of $ 505, receipt number 34690040699 paid. No Docketing Statement filed. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope). (lam),(ps)
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment, Dkt. #5 , is DENIED; nothing in plaintiff's motion persuades me that I was incorrect in dismissing the case on claim preclusion grounds and because he attempted to bring claims against judicial officers who are immune from suit. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/27/2022. (jef),(ps)
May 26, 2022 Filing 5 Motion for Relief from the District Court's Void Judgment by Plaintiff Charles Simon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jef),(ps)
May 16, 2022 Filing 4 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (jef),(ps)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER dismissing this case. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/16/2022. (jef),(ps)
May 13, 2022 Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number 34690040584. (lam),(ps)
May 11, 2022 Filing 2 Letter from clerk's office returning filing fee check to plaintiff for incorrect amount. (lam),(ps)
May 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Charles Simon. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit D: Letter from U.S. DOJ to Plaintiff dated 1/26/2018 and letter from Elliot Engel to AG Holder, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope). (lam),(ps)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simon, Charles v. Department of Justice et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: En Banc U.S. Appeals Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Appeals Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hon. Rudolph Contreras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Prison Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Schwalb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Speights
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?