Allen, Daniel v. Lanier, Inc. et al
| Daniel Allen |
| Lanier, Inc. and Michael Lanier |
| 3:2022cv00268 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant Michael Lanier. Michael Lanier waiver sent on 5/24/2022, answer due 7/25/2022. (Haynie, David)
|
|
Filing 3
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant Lanier, Inc.. Lanier, Inc. waiver sent on 5/24/2022, answer due 7/25/2022. (Haynie, David)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Michael Lanier and Lanier, Inc. (lak)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Trial Demanded against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 01074G.), filed by Daniel Allen. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent to be a Party Plaintiff, #2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons - Lanier, Inc., #4 Summons - Michael H. Lanier) (Haynie, David)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak)
|
|
Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
