Kittleson, Kara v. City of Lancaster et al
| Kara Kittleson |
| City of Lancaster, Nathan Farrey and Matthew Haverland |
| 3:2022cv00313 |
| June 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Matthew Haverland. (lak) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of Lancaster, Matthew Haverland, filed by Kara Kittleson. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Haverland) (Kinne, Paul) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Kara Kittleson. (Kinne, Paul) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to City of Lancaster and Nathan Farrey. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3069124.), filed by Kara Kittleson. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons City of Lancaster, #3 Summons Nathan Farrey) (Kinne, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
