Pegues, Norris v. Hoffman, Karl et al
| Norris Pegues |
| Karl Hoffman, Ms. Warner, Holly Gunderson and L. Dobbert |
| 3:2022cv00352 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Proposed Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Norris Pegues. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing 6
Motion for Leave to File and Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Norris Pegues. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing 5
Initial Order for Paid Pro Se: Plaintiff's complaint taken under advisement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 7/12/2022. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) Screening. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number 34690040864. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing 4
Letter from Clerk's Office Returning Filing Fee Check Issued for Wrong Amount. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing 3
Declaration of Norris Pegues in support of #2 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion for the Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Norris Pegues. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Norris Pegues. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). (lam),(ps)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
