Maholmes, Antonio v. Plemel, Apryl et al
Antonio Maholmes, Jr. |
Apryl V. Plemel, Shaun Morrow and Jamie L. Cork |
3:2022cv00355 |
June 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting plaintiff's #5 request for an extension of time to pay the $12.80 initial partial filing fee. Initial partial filing fee due 8/15/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 7/19/2022. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 5 Letter request for an extension of time to pay the $12.80 initial partial filing fee by Plaintiff Antonio Maholmes, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $12.80 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 7/20/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 6/29/2022. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 3 Inmate Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Antonio Maholmes, Jr. (lam),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/29/2022: #1 IPP Calculation) (lam). |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Antonio Maholmes, Jr. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Antonio Maholmes, Jr. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lam),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.