Hairston v. Warden, FCI Edgefield
Petitioner: Mario Hairston
Respondent: Warden FCI Oxford
Case Number: 3:2022cv00500
Filed: September 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
Presiding Judge: William M Conley
Referring Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, and Supplemental Brief in Support of 2241 by Petitioner Mario Hairston. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Letter from Law Office of Michael R. Dezsi, PLLC, #2 Exhibit B- Request for Adjournment of Parole Revocation Hearing, #3 Exhibit C- Letter from State of Michigan Department of Corrections, #4 Envelope) (jat),(ps)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Case transferred in from District of South Carolina; Case Number 2:21-cv-03643. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (lak)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge update in case. Case now assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (jef),(ps)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 20) as the order of Court. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Clerk of Court substitute 'Warden FCI Oxford" as the respondent to this case and transfer this petition to the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/31/22. (ltap, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Robert de Holl on behalf of Warden, FCI Edgefield (de Holl, Andrew) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Warden, FCI Edgefield placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Mario Hairston 47079-039 OXFORD FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 1000 OXFORD, WI 53952. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Warden, FCI Edgefield. Objections to R&R due by 7/13/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 6/29/2022. (dgar)[Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support Response filed by Mario Hairston. Reply to Response to Motion due by 4/26/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Certificate of Service, #10 Envelope)(dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 17 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Mario Hairston 47079-039 OXFORD FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 1000 OXFORD, WI 53952. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 TEXT ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Petitioner's response deadline is extended to 4/14/2022. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 3/1/2022.(kman, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Motion for Extension of Time to file response to #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support Response filed by Mario Hairston. Reply to Response to Motion due by 3/7/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dgar) (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/28/2022) (dgar, ). Modified on 2/28/2022 to edit event type (dgar). Modified on 3/1/2022 to correct event type (rshu, ). [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 Roseboro Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Mario Hairston 47079-039 OXFORD FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 1000 OXFORD, WI 53952. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ROSEBORO ORDER directing clerk to forward summary judgment explanation to the opposing party and directing that party to respond in 31 days. Response due to #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support Response to Motion due by 3/14/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 2/9/2022. (dgar)[Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support by Warden, FCI Edgefield. Response to Motion due by 2/22/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Declaration of Veronica Hodge with attachments)No proposed order. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(Holmes, Martin) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SECOND NOTICE of Change of Address by Mario Hairston. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address by Mario Hairston (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #7 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, served on US ATTORNEY GENERAL on 12/27/2021. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, sent certified mail to US Attorney General of the United States 950 Pennyslvania Ave Rm 103B Washington DC 20530. Article#9415511899561129967011 (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Mario Hairston 47079-039 EDGEFIELD FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 725 EDGEFIELD, SC 29824. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Apprising the respondent of deadline of 3/2/2022 for filing dispositive motions and directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 12/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Main Document, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Supporting Documents #2, #4 Envelope)(dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Mario Hairston. Response to Motion due by 12/29/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #3 Proper Form Order and AO240 placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Mario Hairston 47079-039 EDGEFIELD FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 725 EDGEFIELD, SC 29824. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 12/13/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 11/22/21. (dgar)[Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Mario Hairston. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Petition, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Envelope)(cpeg, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 9/2/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hairston v. Warden, FCI Edgefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mario Hairston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden FCI Oxford
Represented By: Andrew Robert de Holl
Represented By: Martin L Holmes
Represented By: Leslie K. Herje
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?