Schworck, Jesse v. Okello, Vera et al
Jesse Schworck |
Vera Amondi Okello, Walter Stewart, Emily C. Cunningham, Judge Frank Remington, Judge Valerie Bailey Rihn and Court Commissioner Rhoda Ricciardi |
3:2022cv00552 |
September 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JUDGMENT is entered dismissing this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (voc),(ps) |
Filing 6 OPINION and ORDER Dismissing case without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/8/2022. (voc),(ps) |
Filing 5 Motion for Order for Expedited Consideration of 42 U.S.C.1983 Civil Rights by Plaintiff Jesse Schworck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Dane County Record) (voc),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/26/2022. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 3 Motion for Order for Service by the United States Marshal Service by plaintiff Jesse Schworck. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Jesse Schworck. (lam),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Jesse Schworck. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (lam),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.