Cieslicki, Andre v. Soo Line Railroad
| Andre Cieslicki |
| Soo Line Railroad |
| 3:2022cv00577 |
| October 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** On November 22, 2022, defendant filed a motion to dismiss (dkt. #6 ), for which the court's computer set a December 13, 2022 response deadline. At 4:55 p.m. on December 6, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion requesting a 21-day extension of this deadline, for reasons stated. The next morning, December 7, 2022, plaintiff's attorney called chambers to inquire about the status of his motion. Counsel is advised to take a step back, take a deep breath, and then reflect on whether it is necessary or prudent to contact the court less than 24 hours after filing a motion to extend a deadline that is still a week distant. Notwithstanding counsel's impatience, the request is GRANTED. Plaintiff's new deadline is January 3, 2023. Defendant's reply deadline is extended to January 17, 2023. The telephonic preliminary pretrial conference is moved to January 18, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 12/7/2022. (lak)
|
| Filing 13 Motion for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Andre Cieslicki. Response due 12/13/2022. (Magnuson, John) |
|
Filing 12
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #10 Motion to Admit Tracey Holmes Donesky Pro Hac Vice; granting #11 Motion to Admit Margaret Bauer Reyes Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/30/2022. (lak)
|
| Filing 11 Motion to Admit Margaret Bauer Reyes Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number AWIWDC-3161008.) by Defendant Soo Line Railroad. (Bauer Reyes, Margaret) |
| Filing 10 Motion to Admit Tracey Holmes Donesky Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number AWIWDC-3161002.) by Defendant Soo Line Railroad. (Donesky, Tracey) |
| Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 1/3/2023 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (acd) |
| Action Requested: If you have not already provided your #Consent to Magistrate/Request for Reassignment form, please do so by 12/13/2022. (lak) |
| Filing 9 Declaration of Tracey Holmes Donesky filed by Defendant Soo Line Railroad re: #6 Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Motion for Summary Decision, #2 Exhibit B - Memo in Support of Motion for Summary Decision, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Greta Bauer Reyes, #4 Exhibit D - Declaration of Brian Scudds, #5 Exhibit E - Certificate of Service, #6 Exhibit F - Notice of Motion to Dismiss, #7 Exhibit G - Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #8 Exhibit H - Declaration of Tracey Donesky, #9 Exhibit I - Certificate of Service, #10 Exhibit J - Notice of Motion to Compel, #11 Exhibit K - Memo in Support of Motion to Compel, #12 Exhibit L - Declaration of Tracey Donesky, #13 Exhibit M - Renewed Motion to Compel, #14 Exhibit N - Supplemental Declaration of Tracey Donesky, #15 Exhibit O - Email dated 2/3/2022 to ALJ, #16 Exhibit P - CP's Motion to Dismiss, #17 Exhibit Q - CP's Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #18 Exhibit R - Decision and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss, #19 Exhibit S - Appeal of Decision and Order, #20 Exhibit T - Notice of Appearance, #21 Exhibit U - FRSA Complaint, #22 Exhibit V - Position Statement, #23 Exhibit W - Rebuttal to Position Statement, #24 Exhibit X - Supplemental Submission, #25 Exhibit Y - Letter dismissing FRSA Complaint, #26 Exhibit Z - Henin v. Soo Line Railroad Company, #27 Exhibit AA - Niedziejko v. Delaware & Hudson) (Davis, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 Brief in Support of #6 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Soo Line Railroad (Davis, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Findings of Fact filed by Defendant Soo Line Railroad re: #6 Motion to Dismiss (Davis, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment by Defendant Soo Line Railroad. Brief in Opposition due 12/13/2022. Brief in Reply due 12/23/2022. (Davis, Andrew) |
|
Filing 5
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint. Soo Line Railroad answer due 11/22/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/28/2022. (acd)
|
| Filing 4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by Defendant Soo Line Railroad. Response due 11/4/2022. (Davis, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. (lak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Soo Line Railroad, ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3138058.), filed by Andre Cieslicki. (Magnuson, John) Modified on 10/11/2022. (lak) |
| Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet, (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Magnuson, John) Modified on 10/11/2022. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cieslicki, Andre v. Soo Line Railroad | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andre Cieslicki | |
| Represented By: | John David Magnuson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Soo Line Railroad | |
| Represented By: | Andrew William Davis |
| Represented By: | Tracey Holmes Donesky |
| Represented By: | Margaret Bauer Reyes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
