Nicolet Law Office S.C. v. Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. et al
Nicolet Law Office S.C. |
Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. and Saint Paul Agency, LLC |
3:2022cv00654 |
November 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Defendants. (lak) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Nicolet Law Office S.C.. (Turek, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd., Saint Paul Agency, LLC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3154579.), filed by Nicolet Law Office S.C.. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - March 16, 2022 letter from Attorney Turek to Attorney Goff, #3 Exhibit B - March 17, 2022 letter from Attorney Goff to Attorney Turek, #4 Exhibit C - Letter from Attorney Spence to Attorney Turek, #5 Summons to Bye Goff Rhode, Ltd., #6 Summons to Saint Paul Agency, LLC) (Turek, David) |
Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.