Mark, Jonathon v. Winkleski et al
Plaintiff: Jonathon Mark
Defendant: Mr. Winkleski, Mr. Cahak, Lt. Haas, Mr. Ingenthron, John and/or Jane Doe(s), Lt. Haag and Mr. Thomas
Case Number: 3:2022cv00667
Filed: November 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
Presiding Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Referring Judge: James D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #8 Motion for Clarification. Defendants' Answer is due January 23, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 12/13/2022. (jef),(ps)
December 13, 2022 Filing 8 Motion for Clarification re #4 Order on ifp request - Order on Leave to Proceed, and the Date to Answer by Defendants Cahak, Haag, Ingenthron, Thomas, Winkleski. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Flugaur, Brandon),(ps)
December 12, 2022 Filing 7 Marshal Service Return Executed as to Winkleski, et al. (Attachments: #1 US Marshals Returned Executed as to Cahak, #2 US Marshals Returned Executed as to Haag, #3 US Marshals Returned Executed as to Ingenthron, #4 US Marshals Returned Executed as to Thomas) (acd),(ps) Modified on 12/13/2022 (jef).
December 7, 2022 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Brandon Flugaur for Defendants Cahak, Haag, Ingenthron, Thomas, Winkleski. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Waivers of Service - Daniel Winkleski, #3 Waivers of Service - Timothy Thomas, #4 Waivers of Service - Brian Cahak, #5 Waivers of Service - Travis Haag, #6 Waivers of Service - Brendan Ingenthron) (Flugaur, Brandon),(ps)
December 7, 2022 Answer due 1/23/2023. (jef),(ps)
November 23, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Winkleski, et al. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Thomas, #2 Summons Issued as to Cahak, #3 Summons Issued as to Haag, #4 Summons Issued as to Ingenthron) (rks),(ps)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER on Leave to Proceed: Plaintiff granted leave to proceed against Defendants Cahak, Haas, Ingenthron, Thomas, Winkleski. Leave to proceed denied and case dismissed against John and/or Jane Doe(s). Service to be made by USMS. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/22/2022. (rks),(ps)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/17/2022. (jef),(ps)
November 17, 2022 Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jonathon Mark. (acd),(ps)
November 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jonathon Mark. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (acd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2022: #1 Envelope) (acd).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mark, Jonathon v. Winkleski et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathon Mark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Winkleski
Represented By: Wisconsin Department of Justice_1983 actions
Represented By: Brandon Flugaur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Cahak
Represented By: Brandon Flugaur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Haas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Ingenthron
Represented By: Brandon Flugaur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and/or Jane Doe(s)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Haag
Represented By: Brandon Flugaur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Thomas
Represented By: Brandon Flugaur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?