Maratre, Lenzy v. City of Madison et al
| Lenzy D. Maratre |
| City of Madison, Bernard Gonzalez, Howard Payne and Michael Ott |
| 3:2022cv00681 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is closed without further order of the court. (voc) |
| Filing 4 Undated Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss by Plaintiff Lenzy D. Maratre. (Porter, Allen) Modified on 12/27/2022. (lak) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Lenzy D. Maratre. (Porter, Allen) Modified on 11/29/2022. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Summonses Issued as to All Defendants. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants, ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3160543.), filed by Lenzy D. Maratre. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - City of Madison, #3 Summons - Gonzalez, #4 Summons - Payne, #5 Summons - Ott) (Porter, Allen) Modified on 11/28/2022. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
