Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Hoehn's Huddle, LLC et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Hoehn's Huddle, LLC doing business as Hoehn's Huddle and Daniel Hoehn |
| 3:2023cv00055 |
| January 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is closed without further order of the court. (rks) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. (Janis, Ryan) |
| Action Requested: Counsel for plaintiff requested to promptly file proof of service. (rks) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Daniel Hoehn, Hoehn's Huddle, LLC. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daniel Hoehn, Hoehn's Huddle, LLC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3185561.), filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Hoehn's Huddle, LLC, #3 Summons Daniel Hoehn) (Janis, Ryan) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
