Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund et al v. Grams, Jacob
| Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund and Doug Edwards |
| Jacob Grams doing business as Concrete Service Company |
| 3:2023cv00202 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Returned Executed. Jacob Grams served on 4/8/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. (Ahrens, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Jacob Grams. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiffs Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund, Doug Edwards. (Ahrens, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jacob Grams. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3221350.), filed by Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund, Doug Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ahrens, Christopher) |
| Case directly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Previous case 22-cv-478-wmc. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
