Meddaugh, Jere v. Wood County, Wisconsin et al
| Jere Meddaugh |
| Wood County, Wisconsin and Jon Matthews |
| 3:2023cv00230 |
| April 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant Jon Matthews. Jon Matthews waiver sent on 4/26/2023, answer due 6/26/2023. (Goldman, Lisa) |
| Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Defendant Wood County, Wisconsin. Wood County, Wisconsin waiver sent on 4/26/2023, answer due 6/26/2023. (Goldman, Lisa) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Service to be completed by Waiver of Service of Summons. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3228390.), filed by Jere Meddaugh. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Goldman, Lisa) Modified on 4/14/2023. (lak) |
| Filing 2 Disregard. Modified on 4/14/2023. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
| Filing 1 Disregard. Modified on 4/14/2023. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
